Page 7 of 7

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:58 pm
by roysneon
SRT-4's are turbocharged, stock K24's are N/A.

http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2624937

Look at the first post in this thread. He made more power than a stock SRT will dyno with stock Honda parts, N/A.

We're not even talking about boosted 2.4's anyway.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:09 pm
by racer12306
BIGRAM wrote:your tellin me that you think the k motors just blow away the srt-4 motor
There is more fail in this statement than I can truly comprehend.

Why are you even mentioning turbo engines, we aren't talking about turbo engines.

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:56 pm
by BIGRAM
motor for motor there are not much difference in potential. i agree the k motors are nice but they aren't much better then the shit we got[/quote]

You are exactly correct, an engine that was designed in 1994 is just as good as one designed just a few years ago. :roll:[/quote]

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:53 pm
by keeders08
DOHCRT wrote:
keeders08 wrote:Idk if its just a money issue with american cars that they never came up with anything unique when it came to power cept the HEMI 16 spark plug shit. lol or if its just lack of enginuity(i doubt it) but the fact is Dodge has not gone even tried to make a refined engine like Honda does. compare heads, intakes, throttle bodies.. you'll see what I mean by more refined.
Honda is a company that is run by engineers. American car companies are run by accountants. That's the difference.
There ya go, explains why when you look at the heads/IMs/TBs their so much more refined... nice n smooth. I mean, I will always love my Chryslers but fact is Honda is refined from factory, we must refine ourselves.

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:16 pm
by BIGRAM
A fkn honduh over here just dyno'd 421whp.........275tq lmfao.

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:11 pm
by keeders08
BIGRAM wrote:A fkn honduh over here just dyno'd 421whp.........275tq lmfao.
It finally has enough torque to get outa its own way huh? lol

j/p